 | Disclaimer |
Some of the data sets shown here were collected
during research projects conducted at
West Virginia University under NASA contract NCC2-0979 and NCC5-685.
These data sets may have been interpreted or or massaged or even mangled in
their pre-processing prior to their posting at this site.
Hence, these
data sets may
not accurately report actual values collected from actual
software projects.
The work was partially
sponsored by the NASA Office of Safety and Mission
Assurance under the Software Assurance Research Program led by the
NASA IV&V Facility. However,
reference herein to any specific commercial
product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer,
or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the
United States Government.
|  | ODC at NASA |
RL1: fault report data from JPL.
For a paper that has analyzed this data,
see Better analysis of defect data at NASA or Requirements Discovery
during the Testing of Safety-Critical Software. |  | Source code defects |
Structural features extracted from code, mapped to defect
logs:CM1: 497 "C" functions KC2: 520 "C" functions JM1: 10885 "C" functions
These datasets are in the
PACE format.
From
the NASA IV&V Metrics Data Program
repository
For papers that have analyzed this data, see When can we test less? (best) and Metrics that matter |  | Model-based SE |
NASA's model-based reasoning
toolkit: Livingston. Users must gain permission to use the software in addition to
signing a Software Usage Agreement (I just found this out). If you are remote to NASA Ames,
you can request source "tar balls" from Will Taylor
Remote users will be e-mailed three gzipped tar
files which comprise the source file hierarchy. |  | Reuse data |
In April 2002, IEEE Transactions on Software
Engineering (vol.28, no.4, pp.340-357)
had an article
Success and Failure Factors in Software
Reuse by Moriso, Ezran, and Tully.
These researchers were included tables showing all their data:
- reuse.csv: data from 24 examples
of companies with successful/unsuccessful reuse.
The attributes in that file are discussed in More Success and Failure Factors in Software
Reuse. That paper
also reports on certain difficulties found when we tried to repeat the
the Moriso, Ezran, and Tully results.
|
|